選取您的 Cookie 偏好設定

我們使用提供自身網站和服務所需的基本 Cookie 和類似工具。我們使用效能 Cookie 收集匿名統計資料,以便了解客戶如何使用我們的網站並進行改進。基本 Cookie 無法停用,但可以按一下「自訂」或「拒絕」以拒絕效能 Cookie。

如果您同意,AWS 與經核准的第三方也會使用 Cookie 提供實用的網站功能、記住您的偏好設定,並顯示相關內容,包括相關廣告。若要接受或拒絕所有非必要 Cookie,請按一下「接受」或「拒絕」。若要進行更詳細的選擇,請按一下「自訂」。

Software and architecture patterns - Healthcare Industry Lens
此頁面尚未翻譯為您的語言。 請求翻譯

Software and architecture patterns

HCL_SUS3. Does your organization monitor workload activity and remove or refactor components that are no longer necessary?

Analyze demand on workloads to identify components that can be removed or refactored. Then, engage component owners and stakeholders to redesign clinical workflows, and decrease workload infrastructure

Some healthcare delivery systems and large independent software vendors (ISV) have sprawling IT footprints with numerous siloed systems. Identifying and removing or refactoring components with little or no use can simplify workflows, decrease cost, and improve sustainability. Cloud archives can minimize the cost of retaining data from retired components.

HCL_SUS4. How do you optimize the impact of and applications and the equipment that run them?

Evaluate the overall impact of applications, devices, and equipment

As documented in the Sustainability pillar of the AWS Well-Architected Framework, it is recommended to optimize impact on customer devices and equipment.  For example, as new features are released for a healthcare application, build those features as backward compatible, minimizing the need for new hardware.  Additionally, evaluate the potential impact of new or upgraded hardware requirements to minimize the overall impact when architecting new workloads or features.

隱私權網站條款Cookie 偏好設定
© 2025, Amazon Web Services, Inc.或其附屬公司。保留所有權利。