GuardrailAutomatedReasoningFinding¶
Union Type¶
module-attribute
¶
GuardrailAutomatedReasoningFinding = Union[GuardrailAutomatedReasoningFindingValid | GuardrailAutomatedReasoningFindingInvalid | GuardrailAutomatedReasoningFindingSatisfiable | GuardrailAutomatedReasoningFindingImpossible | GuardrailAutomatedReasoningFindingTranslationAmbiguous | GuardrailAutomatedReasoningFindingTooComplex | GuardrailAutomatedReasoningFindingNoTranslations | GuardrailAutomatedReasoningFindingUnknown]
Represents a logical validation result from automated reasoning policy evaluation. The finding indicates whether claims in the input are logically valid, invalid, satisfiable, impossible, or have other logical issues.
Union Member Types¶
dataclass
¶
Contains the result when the automated reasoning evaluation determines that the claims in the input are logically valid and definitively true based on the provided premises and policy rules.
Attributes¶
dataclass
¶
Contains the result when the automated reasoning evaluation determines that the claims in the input are logically invalid and contradict the established premises or policy rules.
Attributes¶
dataclass
¶
Contains the result when the automated reasoning evaluation determines that the claims in the input could be either true or false depending on additional assumptions not provided in the input context.
Attributes¶
dataclass
¶
Contains the result when the automated reasoning evaluation determines that no valid logical conclusions can be drawn due to contradictions in the premises or policy rules themselves.
Attributes¶
dataclass
¶
Contains the result when the automated reasoning evaluation detects that the input has multiple valid logical interpretations, requiring additional context or clarification to proceed with validation.
Attributes¶
dataclass
¶
Contains the result when the automated reasoning evaluation cannot process the input due to its complexity or volume exceeding the system's processing capacity for logical analysis.