Seleziona le tue preferenze relative ai cookie

Utilizziamo cookie essenziali e strumenti simili necessari per fornire il nostro sito e i nostri servizi. Utilizziamo i cookie prestazionali per raccogliere statistiche anonime in modo da poter capire come i clienti utilizzano il nostro sito e apportare miglioramenti. I cookie essenziali non possono essere disattivati, ma puoi fare clic su \"Personalizza\" o \"Rifiuta\" per rifiutare i cookie prestazionali.

Se sei d'accordo, AWS e le terze parti approvate utilizzeranno i cookie anche per fornire utili funzionalità del sito, ricordare le tue preferenze e visualizzare contenuti pertinenti, inclusa la pubblicità pertinente. Per continuare senza accettare questi cookie, fai clic su \"Continua\" o \"Rifiuta\". Per effettuare scelte più dettagliate o saperne di più, fai clic su \"Personalizza\".

[DL.CI.3] Ensure automated quality assurance for every build - DevOps Guidance
Questa pagina non è tradotta nella tua lingua. Richiedi traduzione

[DL.CI.3] Ensure automated quality assurance for every build

Category: FOUNDATIONAL

As code changes become more frequent in a DevOps environment, it becomes important to reduce the time it takes to get feedback on those changes. Adding automated quality assurance (QA) tests into the continuous integration pipeline enables rapidly validating changes and receiving fast feedback.

Add stages to the pipeline which run pre-deployment checks to validate that code changes work alongside the existing code base. These checks should automatically trigger functional, non-functional, and security tests against the integrated code base and build artifacts.

Breaking-the-build, which stops the integration pipeline process due to test failures, is a powerful feedback mechanism. However, it should be used judiciously. Reserve breaking-the-build for critical issues, such as actual build failures, high severity security findings, or non-negotiable compliance findings, that demand immediate developer attention. Overuse can disrupt the continuous flow of development, leading to unforeseen delays, bottlenecks, and poor developer experience.  Instead, continue to provide feedback to developers in tools they already use, such as IDEs, chat clients, or email, and let them decide if they should stop the process.

It is often more practical to automate enforcement of quality assurance findings as part of the continuous delivery process. This allows enforcement to be objectively targeted based on the environment to which the build is being deployed into. Have an exception mechanism and escalation plans prepared that developers can use if the continuous integration or continuous deployment prevent deployments which they do not agree with.

Related information:

PrivacyCondizioni del sitoPreferenze cookie
© 2025, Amazon Web Services, Inc. o società affiliate. Tutti i diritti riservati.