The Lock:tuple
event occurs when a backend process is waiting to
acquire a lock on a tuple.
Supported engine versions
This wait event information is supported for all versions of RDS for PostgreSQL.
Context
The event Lock:tuple
indicates that a backend is waiting to acquire a lock on a tuple
while another backend holds a conflicting lock on the same tuple. The following table illustrates a scenario in
which sessions generate the Lock:tuple
event.
Time |
Session 1 |
Session 2 |
Session 3 |
---|---|---|---|
t1 |
Starts a transaction. |
||
t2 |
Updates row 1. |
||
t3 |
Updates row 1. The session acquires an exclusive lock on the tuple and then waits for session 1 to release the lock by committing or rolling back. |
||
t4 |
Updates row 1. The session waits for session 2 to release the exclusive lock on the tuple. |
Or you can simulate this wait event by using the benchmarking tool
pgbench
. Configure a high number of concurrent sessions to update the
same row in a table with a custom SQL file.
To learn more about conflicting lock modes, see Explicit Lockingpgbench
, see pgbench
Likely causes of increased waits
When this event appears more than normal, possibly indicating a performance problem, typical causes include the following:
-
A high number of concurrent sessions are trying to acquire a conflicting lock for the same tuple by running
UPDATE
orDELETE
statements. -
Highly concurrent sessions are running a
SELECT
statement using theFOR UPDATE
orFOR NO KEY UPDATE
lock modes. -
Various factors drive application or connection pools to open more sessions to execute the same operations. As new sessions are trying to modify the same rows, DB load can spike, and
Lock:tuple
can appear.
For more information, see Row-Level Locks
Actions
We recommend different actions depending on the causes of your wait event.
Topics
Investigate your application logic
Find out whether a blocker session has been in the idle in
transaction
state for long time. If so, consider ending the blocker
session as a short-term solution. You can use the pg_terminate_backend
function. For more information about this function, see Server Signaling Functions
For a long-term solution, do the following:
-
Adjust the application logic.
-
Use the
idle_in_transaction_session_timeout
parameter. This parameter ends any session with an open transaction that has been idle for longer than the specified amount of time. For more information, see Client Connection Defaultsin the PostgreSQL documentation. -
Use autocommit as much as possible. For more information, see SET AUTOCOMMIT
in the PostgreSQL documentation.
Find the blocker session
While the Lock:tuple
wait event is occurring, identify the blocker and
blocked session by finding out which locks depend on one another. For more
information, see Lock
dependency information
The following example queries all sessions, filtering on tuple
and ordering
by wait_time
.
SELECT blocked_locks.pid AS blocked_pid, blocking_locks.pid AS blocking_pid, blocked_activity.usename AS blocked_user, blocking_activity.usename AS blocking_user, now() - blocked_activity.xact_start AS blocked_transaction_duration, now() - blocking_activity.xact_start AS blocking_transaction_duration, concat(blocked_activity.wait_event_type,':',blocked_activity.wait_event) AS blocked_wait_event, concat(blocking_activity.wait_event_type,':',blocking_activity.wait_event) AS blocking_wait_event, blocked_activity.state AS blocked_state, blocking_activity.state AS blocking_state, blocked_locks.locktype AS blocked_locktype, blocking_locks.locktype AS blocking_locktype, blocked_activity.query AS blocked_statement, blocking_activity.query AS blocking_statement FROM pg_catalog.pg_locks blocked_locks JOIN pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity blocked_activity ON blocked_activity.pid = blocked_locks.pid JOIN pg_catalog.pg_locks blocking_locks ON blocking_locks.locktype = blocked_locks.locktype AND blocking_locks.DATABASE IS NOT DISTINCT FROM blocked_locks.DATABASE AND blocking_locks.relation IS NOT DISTINCT FROM blocked_locks.relation AND blocking_locks.page IS NOT DISTINCT FROM blocked_locks.page AND blocking_locks.tuple IS NOT DISTINCT FROM blocked_locks.tuple AND blocking_locks.virtualxid IS NOT DISTINCT FROM blocked_locks.virtualxid AND blocking_locks.transactionid IS NOT DISTINCT FROM blocked_locks.transactionid AND blocking_locks.classid IS NOT DISTINCT FROM blocked_locks.classid AND blocking_locks.objid IS NOT DISTINCT FROM blocked_locks.objid AND blocking_locks.objsubid IS NOT DISTINCT FROM blocked_locks.objsubid AND blocking_locks.pid != blocked_locks.pid JOIN pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity blocking_activity ON blocking_activity.pid = blocking_locks.pid WHERE NOT blocked_locks.GRANTED;
Reduce concurrency when it is high
The Lock:tuple
event might occur constantly, especially in a busy
workload time. In this situation, consider reducing the high concurrency for very
busy rows. Often, just a few rows control a queue or the Boolean logic, which makes
these rows very busy.
You can reduce concurrency by using different approaches based in the business requirement, application logic, and workload type. For example, you can do the following:
-
Redesign your table and data logic to reduce high concurrency.
-
Change the application logic to reduce high concurrency at the row level.
-
Leverage and redesign queries with row-level locks.
-
Use the
NOWAIT
clause with retry operations. -
Consider using optimistic and hybrid-locking logic concurrency control.
-
Consider changing the database isolation level.
Troubleshoot bottlenecks
The Lock:tuple
can occur with bottlenecks such as CPU starvation or maximum usage of Amazon EBS
bandwidth. To reduce bottlenecks, consider the following approaches:
-
Scale up your instance class type.
-
Optimize resource-intensive queries.
-
Change the application logic.
-
Archive data that is rarely accessed.